| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Retribution's New Bounty System - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think it is safe to say that behavior expressly for the purpose of discouraging others to play, whether ingame or on the forums, isn't good for the game. You can call it meta, but we all know what it is. It's the bully on the playground encourag...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.09 20:50:00
|
2. Retribution's New Bounty System - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And here I thought this thread was about the bounty system...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.09 20:18:00
|
3. Team Avatar and the future of our prototype - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I understand the need to prioritize, but I can't help feeling disappointed. I would love to play my favorite scifi game in another venue than floating brackets in space. Not that they aren't really pretty brackets, but I feel that new vectors for ...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.09 19:51:00
|
4. Specific Examples of Where Risk Should Be Inserted Successfully Into High-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh, I see that this has devolved into another miner qq thread. My apologies.
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.09 11:58:00
|
5. Specific Examples of Where Risk Should Be Inserted Successfully Into High-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
First, I like that the OP posted specific examples, with your reasoning behind them. I would more would do the same in this thread. I can't really speak to null/low because that isn't how I play. I'm not a forum alt, this is my main. I know its s...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.09 11:39:00
|
6. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Matriarch Prime wrote: Ganking is condoned in the game, grieving is not. I believe you meant to say 'griefing'. Grieving is a completely seperate thing altogether. lol, yes. Thx.
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 18:31:00
|
7. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't think you can use such a narrow definition for ganking. Like most words, people use it to mean different things, which is in part why discussions must happen. Ganking traditionally means non-consensual pvp. You can debate whether non-conse...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 18:04:00
|
8. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So let me get this strait? Griefers go out and gank a bunch of miners. Say they should adapt and tank up. While they themselves aren't subject to the same expectation, and then when CCP evens the playing field. Instead of taking their own advice, ...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 03:14:00
|
9. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Matriarch Prime wrote: New equilibrium achieved. There's nothing wrong in EvE with finding a high value target and taking them out. And with crimewatch 2.0, that "equilibrium" is being ****** with yet again. Matriarch Pr...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 01:11:00
|
10. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Matriarch Prime wrote: The ganker will use however many ships or whatever fitting it takes so long as it remains profitable. And if every exhumer and mining barge had taken a few basic precautions to make them unprofitable ...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 00:54:00
|
11. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Matriarch Prime wrote: I really don't get this. Ganking is an inherently asymmetric activity. The devs made you have to work for it, because they know, if the target is worth it, you'll use however many ships it take...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 00:46:00
|
12. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The ganker will use however many ships or whatever fitting it takes so long as it remains profitable. That is part of the asymmetry. I could care less that you can't tank concord. It doesn't change the fact that the formula was firmly in the ganke...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 00:38:00
|
13. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really don't get this. Ganking is an inherently asymmetric activity. The devs made you have to work for it, because they know, if the target is worth it, you'll use however many ships it takes. They just increase where that minimum lay. Which is...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.08 00:14:00
|
14. Buff Ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What engaging gameplay does ganking add to the game? Is it a behavior that needs to be explicitly supported, or was it always just an emergent phenomenon born out of loopholes in the systems? Should players be rewarded greatly for commonly little ...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.10.07 19:51:00
|
15. R.I.P. V R - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As a former marine, my heart weeps tonight. Words are inadequate. May peace be still with the voice of a thousand sorrows. May they bring comfort.
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.13 02:20:00
|
16. PI visual aid... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fantastic! For us visual types this is awesome!
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.09 11:21:00
|
17. Missions, PvE, and CSM 8 - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Schmata Bastanold wrote: OP says that hisec is for casual players. I would like to know what is preventing people to play casually in lowsec for example? There are missions with better rewards, exploration has better sites, belts have better ro...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.06 13:03:00
|
18. Missions, PvE, and CSM 8 - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
The devs know the purpose of high sec, or they wouldn't have put it into the game and continued to support it over the years. They aren't loons, they understand that forum whining should be taken with a rather large grain of salt, and to focus on ...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.06 08:06:00
|
19. Perhaps it is time for General Hull Maintenance Costs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maxpie wrote: Doddy wrote: Crew wages, that would be a good sink. I have some crews that have worked 6 years with no pay. If anything makes sense, it would be this. Presumably, I have thousands, if not tens of thousands of people in my em...
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.06 04:06:00
|
20. What would make eve, really polished? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh, and obvious this game needs the most awesome maneuver ever done in scifi... The Adama Maneuver Gives new meaning to the phase, "hot drop". Supporting our dust mercs should be done with style. :P
- by Matriarch Prime - at 2012.09.05 10:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |